Subject	Well, if you didn't know already the '96 is a bit different>
Posted by	ztothex (Garage Queen :) on June 22, 2001 at 2:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	Experiences With a Twin-Turbo posted by derch on June 22, 2001 at 02:01 PM
Message	OBD-II was introduced in this model and if you're looking to go the modification route, this will make it a bit more difficult since no-one (JWT) has sought to reprogram the ECU for this year since it's the only one in the line of 90-96 that's different -- and an ECU upgrade on a TT is *significant*. But if you're not looking to go that route, it will probably suit you just fine. But if I were to do things over again I'd find a 94 or 95 with *low* milage, pay the extra dollars to start out better. Your price seemed about right if the mileage is right. Good Luck!!! Justin Salt Lake City Z is now in the shop for a rebuild... but April hours will bing May powers! In response to Paul (traxon from SupraForums.com), a Supra owner who blew his stock motor by running 30 psi of boost and a 100 shot of NOS: "Horsepower isn't candy canes and potpourri sprinkled all over this magical motor." – NoOne (April 10, 2001, CamaroSS.com) "Tuning is the key & driver skill/competency is the lock." – twinturboman (April 10, 2001, SupraForums.com)
Follow Ups	Experiences With a Twin-Turbo - derch 14:01:26 06/22/01 Well, if you didn't know already the '96 is a bit different> - ztothex (Garage Queen :) 14:09:43 06/22/01 The difference between the TT and NA is astounding - mitchell :tulsa: 14:11:34 06/22/01 Twin turbo philosophically illustrated>> - dallaz 15:30:36 06/22/01 how true -> - mitchell :tulsa: 15:56:29 06/22/01 price seems high - rpatton 17:17:36 06/22/01 i agree - EmeraldZ 21:23:18 06/22/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.